Accra: Justice Justin Dorgu, a prominent figure in the Court of Appeal with additional duties in the High Court, is currently facing significant backlash over his controversial ruling in the divorce settlement case involving business mogul Richard Nii Armah Quaye and his ex-wife, Joana Coffie. The judgment has sparked widespread criticism, particularly from Deputy Chief of Staff Nana Oye Bampoe Addo, who has labeled the judge's remarks as 'unfortunate' and 'troubling'.
According to Ghana Web, the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) Ghana has filed a petition with Chief Justice Paul Baffour Bonnie, urging for better education on matrimonial and gender-sensitive matters among judges, particularly concerning the distribution of marital property. The petition draws attention to several comments made by Justice Dorgu, highlighting their perceived unconstitutionality and inappropriateness.
One of the most contentious remarks involved Justice Dorgu's assertion that Joana Coffie, being an 'attractive woman', could remarry, which he factored into his judgment. FIDA criticized this statement, arguing that it introduced irrelevant considerations into the legal decision-making process. The association emphasized that such commentary undermines the dignity of litigants and the objective nature of judicial determinations.
Another point of contention was the judge's claim that marriage is not an investment. FIDA expressed concern over the characterization of Joana Coffie's financial claim as 'ridiculous', stressing that while courts can reject unsupported claims, the language used should be measured and relevant. The association further highlighted the importance of acknowledging the often indirect and non-monetary contributions women make to a marriage.
Justice Dorgu's justification for awarding a lump sum settlement of GHS300,000, intended to discourage divorce, also drew criticism. FIDA argued that courts should not deter individuals from seeking legal relief in the event of irreconcilable marital breakdowns. The association warned that such reasoning could create the impression that family law remedies are influenced by personal moral standards rather than legal principles.
Additionally, FIDA expressed disapproval of the judge's order for Richard Quaye to provide only GHS5,000 monthly for the maintenance of their three children, despite his substantial wealth. The association highlighted the inconsistency between the judge's acknowledgment of Quaye's earning capacity and the modest maintenance order, stressing that the reasoning behind such decisions impacts public confidence and the pursuit of justice for women.