Accra: A senior adviser to the Dr Mahamudu Bawumia campaign, Sammi Awuku, has revealed that the former vice president was notably displeased during the peace pact signed by New Patriotic Party (NPP) presidential aspirants, due to concerns surrounding the party's internal elections.
According to Ghana Web, Awuku stated that Dr Bawumia did not conceal his displeasure at the event, marking a shift from his typically cheerful public demeanor. Awuku emphasized that Dr Bawumia's visible displeasure indicated underlying issues within the party.
In an interview with Akwasi Nsiah on Badwam on Adom TV, Awuku elaborated on various decisions by the party's election committee that have unsettled the Bawumia camp. A significant issue cited was the decision to eliminate proxy voting. Awuku explained that Dr Bawumia's strong support base in the Diaspora was evident in his success during the 2023 presidential primaries, and the removal of proxy voting poses a substantial setback.
Awuku described the decision as a potential act of sabotage against Dr Bawumia, as it disproportionately affects his support. He also highlighted ongoing controversies regarding the representation of the Tertiary Students Confederacy (TESCON) in the electoral process, which he believes exacerbates the perception of unfair management.
He further claimed that the party's disciplinary procedures are being applied in a biased manner against the Bawumia camp. Awuku alleged that party members expressing support for Dr Bawumia are swiftly brought before disciplinary committees, while those supporting other aspirants are not sanctioned for similar offenses.
Meanwhile, William Yamoah, Secretary of the NPP Election Committee, refuted claims that the process is biased against any candidate. Speaking on the same program, Yamoah insisted that the committee has acted impartially and is dedicated to conducting a credible election. He assured that the committee has engaged with representatives of all aspirants throughout the decision-making process.
Yamoah expressed surprise at any public criticism from aspirants, given the level of consultation and stakeholder engagement involved in the election process.