Day: April 13, 2024

Eastern Regional Minister, Seth Kwame Acheampong has rallied polling station executives and electoral area coordinators of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) to employ all available strategic methods to secure votes for Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia’s bid for the presidency of Ghana.

Addressing party officials at the inauguration of the Akuapem North and South Constituencies working committees in the Eastern Region, Seth Acheampong stressed the pivotal role of grassroots executives as the driving force behind the party’s success.

He urged them to engage voters across the spectrum, including those from opposition parties, and convince them of the NPP’s agenda.

Hon. Seth Acheampong outlined various strategies to mobilize support, emphasizing the importance of attending to the welfare needs of voters, providing assistance in farming and domestic activities, and articulating the beneficial policies of the NPP.

He added, that even if the need arises to court a voter to vote for NPP, the executives can go ahead to do so.

‘P
olling station campaign is very crucial because that is where elections are won. So even if you have to go to the extent of courting someone to convince the person to vote for the NPP, I will advise you to go ahead. Any strategy you will employ to garner votes for NPP we have to do it, even if you have to fetch water for someone to vote for NPP, go ahead,’ the Regional Minister said.

These efforts, he believes, will bolster Dr. Bawumia’s candidacy and garner widespread support for the party.

Speaking on Dr. Bawumia’s track record as a competent Vice President leading the country to tap the benefits of the digital economy, Hon Acheampong praised his ability to build upon President Akufo-Addo’s governance achievements and drive transformational change across the nation.

He hailed Dr. Bawumia’s tenure as Vice President, characterizing it as unparalleled and setting a new benchmark for the position.

The event was attended by Sammy Awuku, Parliamentary candidate for Akuapem North, Eric Apeadu Yeboah, Parliamen
tary candidate for Akuapem South, OB Amoah, Minister of State at Local Government Ministry, Dennis Miracles Aboagye, among others.

Source: Ghana Web

*We are proud of your stance against LGBTQ practice – Imam to Bawumia*

The Vice President, Dr. Mahanudu Bawumia, has been commended for his tough stance against the practice of homosexuality in Ghana.

Speaking at the observation of Eid prayers in Kumasi on Thursday, Dr. Bawumia, speaking on the LGBTQ issue in Ghana, said he’s opposed to it as a Muslim.

In addition, he said he cannot support the act as a leader because Christians and Ghana’s norms are also opposed to the practice.

Responding to the issue at Jummah Prayers at the National mosque on Friday, the Imam who led the prayers, Imam Ustaz Muaz Ibn Imam Abass, expressed excitement at Dr. Bawumia’s stance.

He commended the vice president, saying Muslims are excited about it because his opposition to the practice is in line with Islamic teachings.

“Yesterday Dr. Bawumia spoke about the practice of homosexuality and he declared his stance against it. Muslims are happy with what Vice President Bawumia said because it reflects our teaching,” the Imam sa
id, in the presence of the National Chief Imam, Sheikh Osman Nuhu Sharubutu.

Below is a full text of what Dr. Bawumia said in Kumasi:

“First of all, it is important to note that our cultural and societal norms and values as Ghanaians frown on the practice of homosexuality,” Dr. Bawumia said.

“Furthermore, as a Muslim, my view on this matter aligns with the position of my religious faith. The Holy Quran is replete with verses frowning on LGBTQ acts, including same-sex marriages. My faith is therefore very strictly against the practice of homosexuality, with no ‘ifs’ or ‘buts’. No shades of grey.”

“Therefore, I cannot support that which my religion, and indeed, all the major religions in Ghana clearly and unequivocably forbid. All the major religious traditions in Ghana (Christianity and Islam) are opposed to this practice and I stand opposed to it now and I will stand opposed to it as President, Insha Allah.”

Source: Ghana Web

Government has finally cleared some 14 containers of essential medicines out of 182 locked up at the Tema Port and the Kotota International Airport.

The essential medicines include Antiretrovirals (ARV) for treatment of HIV, medications for treatment of TB, Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACTs) for the treatment of Malaria, Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs), Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDTs) kits, and Gene Xpert Cartridges among others.

It follows threats by the Coalition of Civil Society Organization Networks in HIV, TB and Malaria serving notice to hit the streets next week to pile pressure on the government to clear some essential drugs donated to the country by Global Fund, valued at some 40 million dollars, which have been sitting at the port since May 2023.

According to the CSOs, the situation has led to needless loss of life as critical drugs are wasting away at the detriment of patients in dire need of them.

The CSOs had expressed serious concerns about the delay in clearing the essential medical
supplies. They argued that this delay was causing harm to patients who desperately needed these medications.

Addressing the press, Chief Director of the Ministry of Health Alhaji Hafiz Adam said the latest action by the government leaves some 168 more containers to be cleared at the ports.

‘Today, 14 containers of health commodities, comprising 10 containers of malaria RDT containers, one container of malaria injection, and three containers of malaria medicine will be delivered to a warehouse,’ he added.

Meanwhile,the Ministry of Health, in a statement on April 9 has initiated processes to ensure clearance of the goods by Friday, 12th April 2024.

‘We wish to re-assure our stakeholders and the general public that the challenges associated with the clearing of MoH medicines and other commodities from the Tema Port and other points of entry have been conclusively and completely resolved by the government,’ the MoH added in a release issued on Tuesday, April 9.

The MoH explained that as part of the Global Fu
nd’s ongoing support to the Government of Ghana, it received 435 containers at the Tema Port between August 2023 and February 2024 containing anti-HIV, TB and malaria medicines and mosquito nets for distribution across the country.

Out of the 435 containers, the MoH said it successfully and swiftly cleared 253 from the Port with the support of the government, leaving 182 containers.

Director, Revenue Policy Division, Ministry of Finance, George Winful also announced the setting up of inter-ministerial committee to address the perennial challenge of clearing medical supplies at the ports.

Source: Ghana Web

In “In Praise of Nepotism: A Natural History,” Adam Bellow situates his views on nepotism within a more comprehensive framework by incorporating observations derived from various countries and cultures and the conspicuous disregard that nepotism often receives.

He observes that nepotism is prevalent globally, being accepted and sometimes necessary in various nations. Furthermore, in the conclusion of his book, he highlighted that aiding one’s relatives has been a fundamental duty in most human societies across history and many parts of the world today. This conclusion succinctly encapsulates the utilization of nepotism within certain Ghanaian families as a mechanism to maintain or reinstate social prestige.

‘Nepotism’, an Italian term, originated from the history of Catholic papacies, where popes and bishops gave their nephews positions of preference. This practice was sometimes carried out with unworthy motives, as seen during the papacy of Sixtus IV and Alexander VI. According to Dario Maestripieri’s arti
cle in the University of Chicago Press, nepotism is a trait that is present in both humans and animals.

Some Ghanaian culture and traditional beliefs, such as the Akan proverb “Animguase mfata Okanni ba,” promote the notion of inheritance or continuity of social prestige through relations. This norm, rooted in traditional settings, has influenced modern politics and government systems. While traditional wisdom suggests regulating nepotism through laws, in a country with conservative sentiment, the call for ethical laws has sometimes been overshadowed by beliefs embodied by traditional fundamentalists, affecting modern politicians.

This conflict between traditional values and modern governance has created tension in Ghanaian society as leaders navigate between upholding cultural norms and promoting meritocracy. Despite efforts to promote transparency and accountability in government, the influence of traditional beliefs continues to shape political dynamics in Ghana.

The absence of regulations governing pol
itical appointments in Ghana has resulted in rampant nepotism and undermined the public’s trust in the political system. The analysis presented here highlights the shortcomings of the political system and the disregard for ethics by all stakeholders, including the executive, legislative, media, and civil society groups, contributing to the popular opinion that the system has failed.

Since the inception of democracy in Ghana during the postcolonial era, when our republic was established, preferential treatment for family and associates has been the norm in our political system. Every era has its connotation of nepotism and cronyism.

As the realm of politics evolved into a fertile environment for those seeking prosperity and achievement, the domain of career politics expanded in tandem. This explains the overt manifestation of patronage masked in nepotism at the highest echelon of government, where the majority of politicians continue to view politics as a way for personal gain.

Political dynasties in Ghana
are frequently disregarded, although the media plays a role in this hidden challenge to democratic principles. The use of deflecting blame or shifting focus by political and news pundits has reduced confidence in modern journalism, poisoning public narratives and making it the new normal. The ‘whataboutism standard’ reveals lapses in journalistic standards, and the media should confront the ruling class to uphold ethical practices.

Undoubtedly, both preceding and present administrations have flagrantly displayed political authority contrary to ethical principles and norms by making unsuitable personnel decisions within the executive branch. However, what is noteworthy is the discerning indignation exhibited by civil societies and pressure groups that aim to establish obscure, distorted benchmarks tinged with political motives.

It would be regrettable if these organizations were absent; nevertheless, civil societies that approach matters of cronyism and nepotism with selective memory loss fail to contribute
in any way to the effort to establish government standards and ethics.

According to Winnie Byanyima, the executive director of Oxfam International, the civil society sphere ensures that decision-making processes prioritize the welfare of the majority rather than a select few, facilitates citizen engagement, and permits substantive oversight of governments and the private sector.

The absence of citizens leaves little space for them to voice opposition or challenge the ruling elites.” Certain activists who compromise on principles and pose as benevolent reform advocates could endanger the survival of our democracy.

Domestic anarchy will unavoidably result from failing to make a strategic shift toward unwavering support for progress that is unaffected by political considerations as citizens’ mistrust of their elected officials grows in response to a climate of uncertainty and negativity.

The importance of maintaining a clear distinction between cultural familial convictions and the state is underscored when
a fundamental ethical breach in government is motivated by religious sentiment (tradition); two recent instances of this are the Agyapa royalty deal and the appointment of a senior minister’s son to oversee the state pension scheme under the NPP in the Akufo-Addo administration of Ghana.

There are likely many such instances that have gone unnoticed or fully unreported in the media. To progress, public and private sector leaders should eliminate counterproductive conservative beliefs from their dialogues.

As opposed to the majority of Arab countries in the Middle East, the differentiation between governance and matters of personal, familial, or religious affiliation is more explicit in Ghana. Ghana is classified as a democracy, not a theocracy, monarchy, or aristocracy.

Since meritocracy undermines established customs, prospective family member appointees must undergo a thorough examination before staffing decisions at the presidency. This is necessary to eradicate any potential conflicts of interest that m
ay arise at the presidency and throughout the government and to ultimately enhance public trust in the state.

Parliament needs to show a genuine dedication to carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The credibility of Parliament has been additionally undermined by the inactive and unproductive sessions of the legislative branch of government. The legislative branch should uphold its duty to critically assess and deliberate on executive personnel decisions, rather than passively approving them without scrutiny.

In national establishments with a large workforce, favoritism, and nepotism often lead to the public being influenced to support numerous incompetent individuals. This cycle of inefficiency and corruption within establishments leads to a lack of trust and accountability from the public, ultimately. Elected officials must prioritize meritocracy and transparency to truly serve the best interests of their constituents.

Despite the prolonged, unsatisfactory status quo, the ruling class must acknowle
dge the potential for change. It is imperative to advocate for structural reforms and accountability measures that prioritize meritocracy and transparency, ensuring a brighter future for the next generation.

Source: Ghana Web

Following the devastating fire that swept through Madina Market in the Greater Accra Region, Mr. Alan Kwadwo Kyerematen has expressed deep sadness and extended heartfelt condolences to all those affected by the tragedy.

In a statement, he conveyed his sympathies to the victims and their families, acknowledging the immense pain they are enduring during this challenging period.

Recognizing the gravity of the situation, Mr. Kyerematen emphasized the importance of solidarity and unity in times of crisis.

He urged the community to come together and extend support to those impacted by the fire, emphasizing that they are not alone in their grief.

The fire at Madina Market has caused significant destruction and loss, leaving many individuals and businesses grappling with the aftermath.

Mr. Kyerematen emphasized the need for collective action to rebuild and restore hope to the affected community.

In his message of support, Mr Kyerematen pledged to stand by the victims and their families, offering assistance and
resources to aid in the recovery efforts.

He underscored his commitment to helping the community overcome this tragedy and rebuild stronger than before.

”As efforts to assess the damage and provide assistance continue, Mr Kyerematen urged all stakeholders to prioritize the needs of the affected individuals and work together towards a swift and effective recovery process.

Mr. Alan Kwadwo Kyerematen’s words of condolence and support reflect his compassion and dedication to serving the people of Ghana, particularly in times of adversity.

His call for unity and solidarity serves as a beacon of hope for the Madina Market community as they navigate through this challenging period.

Source: Ghana Web

Inclusivity, representation, transparency, mutual respect, and fairness are critical foundations for promoting Unity in diversity in any community. As the Gonja community reviews its 1930 constitution, it must prioritize these ideals to manage the challenges of governance and identity in Gonjaland.

However, the present constitutional review procedure appears to deviate from these fundamental principles. Despite our sincere calls for inclusiveness and unity, there is a worrying lack of commitment to these values. This discrepancy has motivated us to call for a more inclusive and open review process.

In this communique, we raise what in our view constitute serious challenges to the integrity of the review process. These challenges range from historical misconceptions and inaccuracies to present-day governance issues in Gonjaland. Each problem highlights the crucial need to align the process with ideals of inclusion, representation, openness, mutual respect, and fairness.

2. Inclusivity, Representation, Trans
parency and Fairness

Unity in diversity, the basic philosophy of Gonjaland, is based on the ideals of inclusion, representation, transparency, and fairness. As a result, for the present constitution review process to properly build unity in diversity in Gonjaland, all stakeholders must actively engage and be involved, while also maintaining openness and fairness throughout the process. Unfortunately, the current state of the review process appears to diverge from these key principles.

To address this problem, we commenced our involvement by writing a letter to the President of the Gonja Traditional Council on October 7, 2023. In this letter, we requested that the fundamental principle of unity in diversity be embraced and implemented. We emphasized the importance of mutual respect among all tribes in Gonjaland, in maintaining the cohesiveness of Gonjaland.

However, our genuine attempts to promote inclusion were dismissed, particularly by the Ngbanya. Despite proactively providing a list of competent member
s from the Vagla Safalba Choruba and Nomee (VASCAN) communities for consideration by the review committee, not a single candidate was selected.

This failure to include other groups raises serious issues about the overall fairness and inclusion of the review process.

Furthermore, we are profoundly concerned about the apparent secrecy surrounding the review committee’s nomination process, as well as the overt concentration on the Ngbanya, which appears to be at the expense of other groups. Such activities undermine the ethos of openness and collaboration, which are critical for undertaking a full and objective examination of the Constitution.

3. Historical misconceptions

It is critical to recognize that Gonjaland is not a homogeneous entity, but rather one based on the ideals of unity in variety. The historical backdrop of colonial administration’s adoption of Ngbanya institutions has sometimes been misinterpreted as implying that indigenous tribes are subjects of Ngbanya chiefs in the Bole region.

The Gon
jaland Youth Association (GLYA) appears to be working under this assumption, as seen by its concentration on Ngbanya chiefs at the expense of indigenous tribes. However, it is crucial to note that this colonial system was purely administrative, and the Ngbanya chief should not impose laws or customs on other groups.

It is imperative to emphasize to our brethren, the Ngbanya, that before the British Colonial Administration took control of the Northern Territories, indigenous tribes and the Ngbanya commonly coexisted peacefully, often intermarrying. It is important to emphasize that the Ngbanya did not have authority over the indigenous tribes.

It is also worth remembering that before to British intervention, Ngabnya divisions operated independently, with no central control. This decentralized structure rendered the Ngabnya system incompatible with the Indirect Rule policy, resulting in the merger of several regions into the Western Dagomba District.

The Ngabnya system only became suitable to the British Ind
irect Rule policy after the Gonja Chiefs Conference in 1923 during which divisional chiefs were either convinced or coerced into accepting Yagbonwura’s authority, which aligned with colonial goals.

As stated in the terms of reference, the British Colonial Administration established chieftaincy in areas without centralized authority, including sections of the Upper West region. However, these indigenous tribes were erroneously classed as acephalous and put under the oversight of the Gonja Chiefs (Ngbnya Chiefs).

It is therefore crucial not to misinterpret this purely administrative arrangement as indicative of Ngbanya’s dominance over the indigenous Vagla, Safalba, Choruba, and Nomee Chiefs, particularly in the extreme Western Gonja part of the Bole Area.

It is important to emphasize that the chiefs and tendons of these indigenous tribes are independent and analogous entities, not subordinates of the Ngbanya chief executives in the Bole area. As a result, they should be recognized and regarded as critical s
takeholders deserving consultation at all times.

Another historical misconception is that the names “Ngbanya” and “Gonja” are synonymous, although this is incorrect.

Historically, the colonial authorities used the name “Gonja” to refer to the inhabitants of the present-day Savannah region of Ghana, which included a variety of ethnic groups such as the Vagla, Ngbanya, Safaliba, Mo, and Choruba. However, the colonial use of Ngbanya mechanisms for indirect control increased the Ngbanya group’s popularity and authority, leading to an erroneous connection of Ngbanya with the larger word “Gonja.”

This misconception is evident in the rhetoric of organizations like the Gonjaland Youth Association and the review committee, which repeatedly allude to entities such as the “Gonja/Gbanye Kingdom” and describe the Gonja/Gbanye as “the ruling estate.” This incorrect categorization reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of Gonjaland’s broad ethnic composition.

A direct consequence of this misconception is the categoriza
tion of our chiefs and traditional leaders alongside titled persons such as Mbonwura, Wanzam, and Akrama. We find this category highly offensive to our chiefs since it belittles their status and ignores their responsibilities and contributions to our community.

We are confident that if we had been involved in the creation of the proposed framework, several of these concerns would have been resolved. We thus call for a more inclusive and representational approach that honours the viewpoints and contributions of all Gonja tribes.

4. Chieftaincy and Land Matters

Chieftaincy and land issues have been major causes of contention in Gonjaland, owing partly to a lack of awareness of their nature within the region. While chiefs are regarded as stewards of the land in many parts of Ghana, the position in the Bole area differs, as outlined in the Gonja Constitution of 1930.

Despite this, there is a widespread misunderstanding that chiefs are the stewards of the land in the Bole area. This misperception has influence
d the committee members’ approach, notably their emphasis on engaging with only Ngbanya Chiefs.

This method raises fundamental concerns about the overall transparency and integrity of the review process. For example, the choice to only engage Tunawura, who is not a Tuna native, without engaging Tuna’s Koro Tindana (Tendana) and/or Donguzee, Gbazaee, Nyumaga, and Gbazee-bee who represent the landowners raises doubts about their ability to appropriately comprehend land borders. Such neglect is not only unjust but also undermines the credibility and effectiveness of the review efforts.

5. Gonjaland Youth Association

We are deeply concerned about the trajectory of the Gonjaland Youth Association, which was founded to serve as a unified forum for all Gonja tribes. Unfortunately, we have discovered that the association has been hijacked by Ngbanya youth, resulting in the marginalization and alienation of other tribes in the Gonja community. This concerning development has resulted in the promotion of narrow, par
ochial interests above inclusion and unity among Gonja tribes.

This unilateral approach taken by certain individuals of the Gonjaland Youth Association jeopardizes our community’s cohesiveness and solidarity.

Prioritizing one tribe’s interests over another exacerbates existing differences and hampers efforts to promote mutual understanding and collaboration. Such activities not only plant seeds of contention but also risk continuing cycles of conflict and animosity inside Gonjaland.

It is of the utmost importance that remedial action be taken immediately to address this disturbing trend within the Gonjaland Youth Association. Realigning the association’s aims and leadership to reflect the diversity of Gonja tribes and ensuring equal representation is critical to maintaining communal unity and peace.

Only by real inclusion and collaborative involvement can we overcome these problems and strive towards a future of solidarity, respect, and shared prosperity among all Gonja tribes.

6. Gonja Traditional Counc
il and the Regional House Chiefs

The current makeup of both the Gonja Traditional Council and the Regional House Chiefs raises concerns about prejudice and discriminatory treatment of other indigenous groups. Currently, only Ngbanya Chiefs have full membership in these Councils, with chiefs from other indigenous tribes limited or reduced to observer status.

This current status quo not only violates the concepts of inclusion, representation, and justice, but it also undermines the underlying tenets that underpin unity in diversity. As a result, we strongly call for immediate action to address this discrepancy and guarantee that chiefs from all indigenous tribes have full membership and vote rights in both the Gonja Traditional Council and the Regional House Chiefs.

The prevailing composition of both the Gonja Traditional Council and the Regional House Chiefs raises concerns regarding bias and unfair treatment towards other indigenous tribes. Presently, only Ngbanya Chiefs enjoy full membership in these coun
cils, while chiefs from other indigenous tribes are relegated to observer status.

This status quo not only contradicts the principles of inclusivity, representation, and fairness but also undermines the fundamental tenets upon which Unity in Diversity is built.

Consequently, we strongly advocate for urgent measures to rectify this disparity and ensure that chiefs from all indigenous tribes are granted full membership with voting rights in both the Gonja Traditional Council and the Regional House Chiefs.

By allowing chiefs from all tribes to participate equally, we can create a more inclusive and representative government system that genuinely represents Gonjaland’s diversity and richness. This phase is critical for fostering unity, mutual respect, and collaboration among all Gonja tribes, resulting in a more equal and peaceful community.

7. Key Demands

In the interest of fostering inclusivity, fairness, and transparency within the constitution review process in Gonjaland. We demand the following:

1. Inc
lusive Representation and Transparency: We demand transparent and inclusive processes for appointing members to the constitution review committee, ensuring equitable representation for all Gonja tribes, including the Vagla community.

2. End to Exclusionary Practices and Bias: We call for an end to exclusionary practices that have marginalized underrepresented tribes and biased decision-making within Gonjaland’s governance structures.

3. Recognition of Indigenous Autonomy and Participation: We urge the recognition of the autonomy and importance of chiefs and tendons from indigenous tribes, ensuring their active participation and consultation in governance matters.

4. Correction of Historical Misconceptions and Promotion of Unity: We advocate for the correction of historical misconceptions regarding Gonjaland’s governance and ethnic composition, promoting a more accurate understanding that fosters unity and inclusivity.

5. Reform of Gonja Youth Association: We demand the reform of the Gonjaland Youth Associ
ation to better represent and serve the interests of all Gonja tribes, promoting unity and cooperation among its members.

6. Equal Participation in Traditional Councils and Land Ownership Rights: We call for equal participation and voting rights for chiefs representing all indigenous tribes in both the Gonja Traditional Council and Regional House Chiefs, along with clarity on land ownership rights for all communities.

7. Commitment to Unity in Diversity: We emphasize the importance of upholding the principles of Unity in Diversity within Gonjaland, prioritizing mutual respect, cooperation, and shared prosperity among all Gonja tribes.

8. Conclusion

The issues described in this paper highlight the vital need for a more participatory, transparent, and equitable approach to Gonjaland’s constitutional reform process. The concepts of inclusion, representation, openness, and fairness must be actively supported and integrated into all aspects of governance and decision-making.

The disregard for these values, as
demonstrated by the exclusion of certain groups and the continuation of historical misconceptions, jeopardizes the review process’s integrity and efficacy. It not only exacerbates existing differences but also has the potential to perpetuate cycles of conflict and animosity in the Gonjaland.

To overcome these problems and create a future of togetherness, mutual respect, and shared prosperity for all Gonja tribes, remedial actions must be taken as soon as possible.

This includes realigning the goals and leadership of organizations like the Gonjaland Youth Association, ensuring equitable representation in governance structures such as the Gonja Traditional Council and Regional House Chiefs, and encouraging genuine collaboration and engagement among all stakeholders.

Gonjaland can chart a more egalitarian, peaceful, and successful future for all of its tribes by prioritizing inclusiveness, representation, transparency, and fairness. Unity in Diversity can only be achieved through collaborative activity and de
dication to these essential ideals in Gonjaland.

Thank You.

Source: Ghana Web

Former Chairman of the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC), Prof. Stephen Adei, has revealed that he has been spared from the brunt of the recent power crisis, commonly known as ‘dumsor,’ thanks to his use of solar panels.

Prof. Adei disclosed that he relies on solar power for 95% of his energy needs, shielding him from the disruptions faced by Ghanaians.

In an interview with GHOne TV, he expressed surprise at the government’s reluctance to promote solar energy usage among Ghanaians.

‘Let me confess that I haven’t experienced the worst part of the power crisis personally because I am on solar power,” he said. “However, let me say that it’s amazing why the government is not encouraging the use of solar, because I don’t have to rely on ECG, and my solar provides me with power about 95 percent of the time.”

He further called upon key stakeholders in Ghana’s power sector, including the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG), the Volta River Authority (VRA), and the Minister for Energy, Dr. Matthew Opo
ku Prempeh, to address the issue of dumsor to enable citizens to plan.

“I think that, again, this is one of the issues where being transparent about what is really happening is better than leaving room for speculation about whether it is dumsor or sordum,” Prof. Adei remarked.

Source: Ghana Web

Former Ghana Football Association (GFA) President, Kwesi Nyantakyi faced defeat in his bid to secure the NPP parliamentary candidacy in the Ejisu Constituency.

The NPP conducted primaries to select a candidate for the upcoming by-election following the passing of the constituency’s Member of Parliament, John Kumah, on March 7, 2024.

In a tight race, Lawyer Kwabena Boateng emerged victorious with 393 votes, outshining his competitors.

Nyantakyi managed to secure only 35 votes out of a total of 1080 cast.

The full results are as follows:

Lawyer Kwabena Boateng – 393 (Winner)

Dr. Evans Duah – 61

Clinsma Karikari Mensah – 2

Helena Mensah – 302

Abena Pokua – 0

Portia Mensah – 6

Mr. Kwesi Nyantakyi – 35

Aaron Prince Duah – 2

Mama Yaa Aboagye – 229

Source: Ghana Web